Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V D V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 2 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | GRIFFITH JACK | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 3 | MITCHELL Philip D. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | ARIZA Isaac A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 7 | STANLEY Mason B. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 8 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 9 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 10 | GATZA Logan | V D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 11 | GRAHAM Roy J. | D V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | ZHANG Andy W. | V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 13 | SICHITIU Alexander | D D D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | MEYERS Lee P. | V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 16 | LEE Jacob | V D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 17 | ZHAO Dylan L. | V V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 18 | WECHSLER Jacob | D V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | KEE Andrew L. | D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | D V V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 21 | OH SEAN | D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | FIGUEROA ANDRES | D V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 23 | KIM Chaemin | D D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 24 | SYLVESTER William Z. | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 25 | YIM Alex | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 26 | COLLUM Thomas | V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 27 | GRASS James D. | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 28 | LATIF Ali A. | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 29 | AMMON Blue | D D D V D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 30 | EMENHEISER Conrad | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 31 | ROSSEN Michael | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 32 | DONDERIS AJ | D D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 33 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.