Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 39% | 56% |
2 | OH SEAN | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
3 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% |
3 | LI Matthew | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% |
5 | QIAN Jason H. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 38% | 11% |
6 | GORBACHEV Alexander | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
7 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
8 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 55% | 24% |
9 | KNIZHNIK David | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
10 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | 2% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | |
11 | TANG Owen S. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
12 | LEE Lukas | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
13 | ORLOV Dmitriy | - | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% | - |
14 | LEE Jacob | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% | - |
15 | DANIZ T FERNANDO A. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
16 | WANG Brayden | 22% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
17 | ZOU Yuming | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
18 | PAN Henry | 9% | 42% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
19 | CHEN Junxuan | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
20 | YAO Bradley | - | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
21 | QUINTERO Julian | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
22 | LEE EUNJAE | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
23 | MOE Annan | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
25 | BURKETT Jackson Cash | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
26 | KOE Beckett | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
27 | LEE EUNSOO | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
28 | DEMIR Omer | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.