The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Tiger Open 2020

Mixed Épée

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 9:00 AM

Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 SHIN Sung (Andy) - - 1% 13% 46% 40%
2 MALLOY Patrick G. - - 1% 10% 37% 52%
3 CHO Tyler H. - - 5% 26% 45% 24%
3 SWENSON Keane J. - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
5 JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. - 4% 20% 38% 30% 8%
6 ZIMINSKY Karel M. 5% 24% 39% 25% 6%
7 GIVENS Sean D. 1% 10% 26% 35% 22% 6%
8 WEBB Jacob T. - 3% 18% 38% 32% 8%
9 CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. 1% 8% 29% 41% 21%
10 DULISSE ALeX 3% 20% 41% 30% 6%
11 JAMES Samuel - 6% 30% 44% 19%
12 PARNAS Apollo 2% 13% 34% 37% 14%
13 CHEN Wesley 1% 11% 32% 39% 16%
14 MATTSON Rachel 1% 14% 37% 36% 12%
15 LIU Darren - 2% 16% 39% 33% 9%
16 CLICK Aiden - 2% 13% 37% 42% 7%
17 KELLY Michael G. - 3% 18% 36% 32% 10%
18 HAWKINS Daniel P. 2% 19% 38% 30% 10% 1%
19 WAGNER Lyndsay K. 8% 29% 36% 21% 5% 1%
20 NORMAN Christian - 4% 20% 40% 30% 5%
21 PARNAS Ely 12% 35% 35% 15% 2%
22 GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) 4% 22% 41% 28% 6%
23 LENAHAN Conor J. 2% 12% 33% 36% 15% 2%
24 LEE Kennith 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2%
25 LIM Joshua - 1% 9% 29% 40% 21%
26 KRUEGER Nathaniel W. 3% 16% 37% 34% 10%
27 KRUEGER Rick J. 7% 28% 38% 22% 5%
28 GUNDUBOGULA Raj - 6% 30% 41% 20% 3%
29 MERMIGKAS John 8% 35% 40% 15% 2% -
31 JUNG Minche 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
32 DREITZLER Nicholas 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
33 PAK Matthew 2% 23% 43% 26% 6% -
34 PARK Jong-Eun 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
35 TISON John D. 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
36 KRUEGER Josh - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12%
37 SHELANDER Connor 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% -
38 THORNTON Zachary 2% 19% 43% 31% 6%
39 FLOYD Sean C. 2% 17% 38% 31% 10% 1%
40 WEBSTER Davis G. - 5% 21% 38% 29% 7%
41 HERRIMAN Grant 5% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
42 RICKMAN II Samuel B. 23% 43% 27% 7% 1% -
43 WHITE Taylor 4% 25% 42% 25% 4%
43 TILAKA Michael 3% 19% 39% 31% 9%
45 PROCTER Jonathan R. 26% 43% 25% 6% -
46 SCHWARTZ Aaron 11% 33% 36% 17% 3%
47 NAPIER Maxwell P. 5% 25% 41% 25% 4%
48 DOESBURG Paikea 2% 21% 41% 29% 7%
49 MISKELL William 10% 34% 37% 16% 2%
50 JAMES Josephine 7% 26% 38% 24% 6%
51 ALVARENGA Darby 54% 37% 8% 1% -
52 EVANS Grant 1% 18% 43% 29% 7% 1%
53 SMITH Naja 11% 31% 35% 19% 4% -
53 CHRONISTER Charles 5% 44% 38% 11% 1% -
55 PRIOLEAU Isabel 1% 10% 34% 37% 16% 2%
56 MERRIMAN Morgan 32% 48% 17% 2% - -
57 COOPER Judson 6% 26% 39% 24% 5% -
58 COURTNEY Elya Rebekah 23% 44% 26% 6% -
58 DARLING Caitlin 25% 42% 26% 7% 1%
60 ALMUHAWAS Abdulmohsen 70% 28% 2% - - -
60 RAFF Kaleb 52% 37% 10% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.