Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHIN Sung (Andy) | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | MALLOY Patrick G. | V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | CHO Tyler H. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | SWENSON Keane J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 6 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | V D V V | V V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 7 | GIVENS Sean D. | D V V D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 8 | WEBB Jacob T. | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. | V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 10 | DULISSE ALeX | V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 11 | JAMES Samuel | V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 12 | PARNAS Apollo | V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | CHEN Wesley | V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 14 | MATTSON Rachel | V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 15 | LIU Darren | V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | CLICK Aiden | D V D D D | V V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 17 | KELLY Michael G. | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 18 | HAWKINS Daniel P. | D V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 19 | WAGNER Lyndsay K. | V D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 20 | NORMAN Christian | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | PARNAS Ely | D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 22 | GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) | D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | LENAHAN Conor J. | V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | LEE Kennith | V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | LIM Joshua | V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 26 | KRUEGER Nathaniel W. | V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 27 | KRUEGER Rick J. | D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 29 | MERMIGKAS John | D D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 31 | JUNG Minche | D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 32 | DREITZLER Nicholas | D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 33 | PAK Matthew | V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 34 | PARK Jong-Eun | V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 35 | TISON John D. | V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 36 | KRUEGER Josh | V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 37 | SHELANDER Connor | V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 38 | THORNTON Zachary | D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 39 | FLOYD Sean C. | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 40 | WEBSTER Davis G. | D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 41 | HERRIMAN Grant | D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 43 | WHITE Taylor | D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 43 | TILAKA Michael | D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 45 | PROCTER Jonathan R. | D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 46 | SCHWARTZ Aaron | V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 47 | NAPIER Maxwell P. | D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 48 | DOESBURG Paikea | V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 49 | MISKELL William | V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 50 | JAMES Josephine | V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 51 | ALVARENGA Darby | V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 52 | EVANS Grant | D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 53 | SMITH Naja | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 53 | CHRONISTER Charles | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 55 | PRIOLEAU Isabel | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 56 | MERRIMAN Morgan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 57 | COOPER Judson | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 58 | COURTNEY Elya Rebekah | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 58 | DARLING Caitlin | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 60 | ALMUHAWAS Abdulmohsen | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 60 | RAFF Kaleb | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.