San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LUH Ethan K. | V V V V D V | V V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | BANERJEE Anup | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | NG Eben S. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | DETERING Julian | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | GODZHIK Zachary | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | COELHO Cristiano P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 7 | FINNEY Lorenz | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 8 | TSAY Jeremy M. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 9 | AIBEL Hudson J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 10 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 11 | KHER Roan | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 12 | BAO Aaron | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 13 | BAEK David | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 14 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 15 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 16 | WU Lucas | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 17 | CANLAS Nathan | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | MA Andrew | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | CHEN Justin K. | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | ZHANG Jiening G. | V V D V V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 22 | WYMAN Julian | V V D D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 23 | WANG Ethan | V V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 24 | TAN Christien | D V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | CHENG Jonathan | V D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | V D D V V D | V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
| 27 | CHASTAINE Ryan L. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 28 | MA Bryant | V V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 29 | HOSKERI Anik S. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 30 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 31 | RUBIN Max | D D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 32 | LLIDO Soren | D V D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 33 | SMITH Grant D. | D V V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 34 | ZENG Chuyi | V D V D V V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 35 | LYNCH Owen C. | V V D D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 36 | MAK Osman K. | V V V V D D | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 37 | WOO Christian | D D V V V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 38 | CO Dylan | V V D D V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 39 | ZUO Ethan | D D V V D V | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 40 | SHEN Owen | D D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 41 | TONKOVICH Ryan | D V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 42 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 43 | LI Jett | D V D V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 44 | TEH Ryan | D D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 45 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | D D V V D D | D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 45 | CAZALET George | V D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 47 | RANJITH Yash M. | D V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 49 | SUN Christopher | D D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 50 | NG Micah | D V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 51 | CHEN Evan | V D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 52 | MYERS Dean | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 53 | LING Eddie | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 54 | SHPOLYANSKY Jax F. | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 54 | JIANG Alex | V D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 56 | BHARADWAJ Venkatesh | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 57 | GREGORY Henry F. | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 58 | AGRAWAL Niki | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 59 | TUAN Evan | D D D D D V | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 60 | JUDSON Colin | D D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 62 | RAMOS Owen | D D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 63 | SAH Steven | V D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 64 | ZWICKER Jacob | D D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 65 | PETERSON Lucas | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 66 | CHU Colin | D D V D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 67 | CHEN Tyler | D V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 68 | HOLLENBECK Walker | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 69 | MIN Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 70 | LAURIMAA Emil | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.