San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUH Ethan K. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% |
2 | BANERJEE Anup | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
3 | NG Eben S. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 30% |
3 | DETERING Julian | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
5 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
6 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% |
7 | FINNEY Lorenz | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 11% | < 1% |
8 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% |
9 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
10 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
11 | KHER Roan | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
12 | BAO Aaron | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
13 | BAEK David | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
14 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - |
15 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
16 | WU Lucas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% |
17 | CANLAS Nathan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
18 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
19 | MA Andrew | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
20 | CHEN Justin K. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
21 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
22 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
23 | WANG Ethan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
24 | TAN Christien | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
25 | CHENG Jonathan | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
27 | CHASTAINE Ryan L. | - | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
28 | MA Bryant | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
29 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 20% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
30 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
31 | RUBIN Max | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | LLIDO Soren | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
33 | SMITH Grant D. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 4% |
34 | ZENG Chuyi | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
35 | LYNCH Owen C. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
36 | MAK Osman K. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
37 | WOO Christian | 3% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
38 | CO Dylan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
39 | ZUO Ethan | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | SHEN Owen | 1% | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
41 | TONKOVICH Ryan | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - |
42 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
43 | LI Jett | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
44 | TEH Ryan | 6% | 40% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
45 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
45 | CAZALET George | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
47 | RANJITH Yash M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
49 | SUN Christopher | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
50 | NG Micah | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
51 | CHEN Evan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
52 | MYERS Dean | 11% | 37% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
53 | LING Eddie | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
54 | SHPOLYANSKY Jax F. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
54 | JIANG Alex | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
56 | BHARADWAJ Venkatesh | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
57 | GREGORY Henry F. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
58 | AGRAWAL Niki | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | - |
59 | TUAN Evan | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | JUDSON Colin | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
62 | RAMOS Owen | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
63 | SAH Steven | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
64 | ZWICKER Jacob | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
65 | PETERSON Lucas | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
66 | CHU Colin | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
67 | CHEN Tyler | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | - |
68 | HOLLENBECK Walker | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
69 | MIN Lucas | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
70 | LAURIMAA Emil | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.