400 N High Street, OH - 400 N High Street, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GORNOVSKY David J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | PEDERSEN Trevor W. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
3 | FULLERTON Houston T. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
3 | MARTIN Nathan C. | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
5 | LI Jesse | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
6 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
7 | DAVIES Morgan | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
8 | MARTIN Liam N. | V D D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
9 | EDWARDS Ethan S. | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
10 | GLASS Timothy C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
11 | NORTH Gary S. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
12 | GUINAN Joseph | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | WANG William | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
14 | KENT Dwain | D D V V V | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
15 | BEACH John | D V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
16 | SHERWOOD Dominic | D V V D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
17 | CHAWLA Armaan | V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
18 | RHYU Kozmo | V V D V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
19 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
20 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
21 | UKOLOV Dimitri | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
22 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
23 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | V V D D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
24 | SHAH S Ayush | V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
25 | PICK Ian | D V V D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
26 | WINTERSHEIMER Adam | V D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
27 | HANXU Richard A. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | TEITENBERG John F. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
29 | O’DEA Anthony | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
30 | MCDONNELL Michael | D D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
31 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | D V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
32 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | V D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
33 | SWANSON Dave | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | SINGH Anil | D V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
35 | CULLEN Daniel F. | D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
36 | KLINE R. Jay | D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
37 | HERMANSON David B. | D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
38 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
39 | STEIBER Zane T. | V D D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
40 | MOORE Gabriel | V D D V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
41 | EDWARDS Tim | D V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
42 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
43 | WANG Albert | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
44 | YANG Brandon | D D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
45 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
46 | MA Bochen | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
47 | HONG James | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
48 | PARKS Robert | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
49 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
50 | WHEELER Mark C. | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
51 | STEFANOV Michael A. | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
52 | MARTIN Dirk | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
53 | KENT Matthew | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
54 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
55 | DICKSON Tim | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
56 | WILLIAMS Richard | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
57 | FITZGERALD Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.