Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 5% | 28% | 48% | 19% | |
2 | AHN Jun | - | 2% | 21% | 47% | 26% | 4% | |
3 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% | |
3 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% | |
5 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
6 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
7 | MENG Zhaoyi | 1% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
8 | HORSLEY Alexander | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 25% | |
9 | KWON Ethan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
10 | SHA Yi Peng | - | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
11 | BING Charles | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
12 | WU Alexander | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
13 | GUO Sean | 1% | 11% | 46% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
14 | ACHILOV Sayid | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
15 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
16 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | - | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
17 | CHAN Tyler | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% | |
18 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | - | 5% | 24% | 49% | 22% | |
19 | CATINO Brennen | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
20 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
21 | LEVIN Michael | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
22 | BROWN Alexander R. | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
23 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
24 | WANG Gerald Y. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
25 | OROSZLAN Daniel | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
26 | VERSTEELE Sander | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
27 | BELLUOMO David C. | 3% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - | |
28 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 42% | |
28 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 1% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
30 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
31 | JIANG Owen | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
32 | BOUSSY Luciano | 18% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
33 | CUTLER Andrew | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
34 | GUO Jacob | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
35 | EIG Ethan A. | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | SONG Bryan | 6% | 46% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
37 | ZHONG Guoren | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
38 | SCHALES Peyton | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | KUO Oliver K. | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
40 | RADTKE Jakob | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | DAS Nikhil | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | |
42 | WU Benjamin | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
43 | CAPUTO john | 86% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
44 | WILHELM Drake | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.