Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | - | - | - | 5% | 37% | 57% | |
2 | LEE Jacob J | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% | |
3 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
3 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
5 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 48% | 36% |
6 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
7 | WANG Jackson | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 10% | |
8 | XIANG Derrick | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
9 | JIA Jing Yu | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
10 | LI Aaron | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 48% | 32% |
11 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
12 | LEWIS Akhil | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
13 | LIN James G. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
14 | XU Andy P. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
14 | LI Ayren | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
16 | LIU Derek | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
17 | KOVACS Wyatt | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
18 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 24% | |
19 | CHENG Ethan | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
20 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
21 | LIU Ryan | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
22 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
23 | NICOLL William | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
24 | JIE WanYue | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | - |
25 | DALBERG Anders | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
26 | LEE Eugene | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
27 | ZHOU Leon | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
28 | GUO Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
29 | SHAO Eric | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
30 | GERRISH William | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
31 | WANG Auther | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
32 | WHELAN Alexander H. | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
33 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% | - |
34 | LEE Brendan | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
35 | GAO Payton | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
36 | OZBURN Will | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
37 | BOBROW Silas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 54% | 5% |
38 | MILLER Jordan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
39 | SHIM Peter S. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | YE Gavin | 27% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | KIAYIAS Aris | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
42 | UNGERER Roger M. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
43 | KOKES William | - | 2% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | |
44 | SIMON Luke | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | LEE Jonah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 46% | 19% |
46 | BLACK Zachary | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
47 | HUANG Julian | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
48 | BLEIL Tyler | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
49 | LIM Kevin | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
50 | HIGGASON Hugh | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
51 | LI Allen | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
52 | LIU Jeremiah | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
53 | WILL Wrightington | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
54 | MALHAM Andrew | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
55 | FRUSZTAJER Miklosh | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - | |
56 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
57 | TANG Terry | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
58 | CHA James | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% | - |
59 | HOSANAGAR Ninad | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
60 | WEI Qian | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
61 | ARCE Andrew W. | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
62 | LU Jason | 21% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
63 | ONIK Ari N. | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
64 | KRASNOV Georgy | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
65 | CROWE Adam D. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
66 | WU Andrew Y. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
67 | CHOI Eugene | 61% | 37% | 2% | - | - | - | |
68 | ZENG Rick | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
69 | XIA Eric | 8% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
70 | WANG Ralph | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.