Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | |
| 2 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
| 3 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 3 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
| 5 | ZHAI Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% |
| 6 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 7 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 10% | |
| 8 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 9 | JIA Jing Yu | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 10 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 32% |
| 11 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 12 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 13 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 14 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% | |
| 14 | LI Ayren | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
| 16 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% | |
| 17 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 18 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | |
| 19 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 20 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 21 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 22 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 23 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
| 24 | JIE WanYue | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 25 | DALBERG Anders | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | ZHOU Leon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 28 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 19% | |
| 29 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 1% | |
| 30 | GERRISH William | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | WANG Auther | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | WHELAN Alexander H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 33 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% | - |
| 34 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 35 | GAO Payton | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | OZBURN Will | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 37 | BOBROW Silas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 5% |
| 38 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 39 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | YE Gavin | 100% | 73% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 42 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 43 | KOKES William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
| 44 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 19% |
| 46 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 47 | HUANG Julian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | BLEIL Tyler | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LIM Kevin | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 50 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LI Allen | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | LIU Jeremiah | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 53 | WILL Wrightington | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | FRUSZTAJER Miklosh | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | TANG Terry | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 58 | CHA James | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% | - |
| 59 | HOSANAGAR Ninad | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | WEI Qian | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | LU Jason | 100% | 79% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 89% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | KRASNOV Georgy | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 65 | CROWE Adam D. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 66 | WU Andrew Y. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | CHOI Eugene | 100% | 39% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | XIA Eric | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 70 | WANG Ralph | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.