National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TUCKER ALARCON Ariadna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% |
| 3 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 3 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
| 5 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 6 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 7 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 8 | SCHATZ Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 9 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 10 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 11 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% |
| 12 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 13 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
| 14 | MICHAELSEN Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 15 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 16 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 7% |
| 17 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 11% |
| 18 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 19 | WU Celine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% | 5% |
| 20 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 3% |
| 21 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 22 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | XU Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 18% |
| 24 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | PALMER Meredith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 26 | GU EMILY | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 27 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
| 28 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
| 29 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 30 | MI Anning | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | RASO Olivia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 32 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 22% |
| 34 | FELLUS Talia E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | WANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 36 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | QIAN Zhiyan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 39 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 42 | LIN Emma | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 44 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 45 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 90% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
| 47 | MI Aileen | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 48 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 89% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | BAROCHIA Saatchi | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KOROTCOVA Anastasia | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | SMITH Emilee E. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | LAM Victoria M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 57 | ABD-ELMONIEM Nusayba K. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | JONES Jenna | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 61 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 62 | DATLA Medha | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | ALEXANDER Amelia | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | ZHUANG Sophie | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | KNOEPFFLER ANDREA V. | 100% | 90% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 66 | KRUPENKO Sabrina R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 67 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 68 | SARKARIA Jasminder | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 69 | DATLA Meha | 100% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | SHKLYAR Estella | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 71 | ZARE Yasmin | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | CAO Domi Yu En | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 73 | TAI Serena | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | WIERENGA Esther | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | BOWDEN Ms Hope A. | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | TAI Valerie | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | WANG Cynthia | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.