National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DODIN David | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
2 | ZHENG Andy | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | SAUNIER Cameron | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
5 | KUGLER Luke | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
6 | TRULL A.J. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
7 | YU Jason | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
8 | LEE Aiden | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
9 | LAI Boden | V V V V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
10 | GINZBURG Adam | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
11 | BRADSHAW Carter | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
12 | MAO Benjamin | V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
13 | JIANG Matthew | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | MITEV Alexander | V D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
15 | DURKIN Hudson | D V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
16 | LAM Alan | V D V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
17 | ZHANG Chaoran | V D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
18 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
19 | BUI Henry | V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
20 | NAKAS Levent | V D V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
21 | ZENG Andrew | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
22 | CHEN Bowen | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
23 | LU Nathan | V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
24 | SOKOL Luke | V V D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
25 | SIEDOW William | V V D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
26 | ALI Farhan | D V V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
27 | MOY Madison | D D V V D | V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
28 | BANSAL Arjun | D D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
29 | SINGH Ravin | V D D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
30 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | D D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
31 | ROLAND Mackinley | D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
32 | CHAWLA aarav | D D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
33 | BRODETSKY Maxim | V D V V V | D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
34 | RATMANSKY Alexander | D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
35 | ALEXANDER John | D V V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
36 | GRENKE Dexter | D V V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
37 | YIN Justin | V D V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
38 | BORISENKO Samuel | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
39 | FARBER Ian S. | V V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
40 | SINGLETON Aman | D V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
40 | GORDON Ian | D V D V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
42 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
42 | KIM Tae | D D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
44 | LOISEAU Oscar | V V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
45 | BO Genero | D D D V V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
46 | PAN Edwin | D V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
47 | ZIEGLER John | D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
48 | DOAN Christopher | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
49 | KATSEV edward | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
50 | HARRIS Troy O. | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
51 | SHAFFER Tyler | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
52 | NAM Nathaniel | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
53 | LEE DoWon | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
54 | YAO Tristan | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
55 | KIM Henry | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
56 | HOYOS PALACIOS David | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
57 | YU Rainger | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
58 | KIM Julian | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.