National Harbor, MD - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DODIN David | - | - | - | - | - | 6% | 94% |
| 2 | ZHENG Andy | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% |
| 3 | SAUNIER Cameron | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 40% | 32% |
| 3 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 5 | KUGLER Luke | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 6 | TRULL A.J. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 7 | YU Jason | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 8 | LEE Aiden | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 9 | LAI Boden | 2% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 10 | GINZBURG Adam | - | 4% | 27% | 47% | 20% | 2% | |
| 11 | BRADSHAW Carter | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 12 | MAO Benjamin | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 13 | JIANG Matthew | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 14 | MITEV Alexander | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 15 | DURKIN Hudson | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | LAM Alan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Chaoran | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | CHUTKAY Sai Pratham | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% | |
| 19 | BUI Henry | 2% | 19% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | NAKAS Levent | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 21 | ZENG Andrew | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 22 | CHEN Bowen | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 23 | LU Nathan | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | SOKOL Luke | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 25 | SIEDOW William | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | ALI Farhan | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | MOY Madison | - | - | < 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 28 | BANSAL Arjun | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
| 29 | SINGH Ravin | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 30 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | ROLAND Mackinley | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | CHAWLA aarav | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 33 | BRODETSKY Maxim | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | RATMANSKY Alexander | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 48% | 10% | |
| 35 | ALEXANDER John | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | GRENKE Dexter | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | YIN Justin | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 31% | 1% |
| 38 | BORISENKO Samuel | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | FARBER Ian S. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | SINGLETON Aman | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 40 | GORDON Ian | 8% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 42 | KIM Tae | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | LOISEAU Oscar | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | BO Genero | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 46 | PAN Edwin | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 47 | ZIEGLER John | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 48 | DOAN Christopher | 17% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 49 | KATSEV edward | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 50 | HARRIS Troy O. | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 51 | SHAFFER Tyler | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | NAM Nathaniel | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 53 | LEE DoWon | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | YAO Tristan | 53% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | KIM Henry | 51% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | HOYOS PALACIOS David | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | YU Rainger | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 58 | KIM Julian | 18% | 46% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.