Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 2 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% |
| 3 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 3 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 5 | HORSLEY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% |
| 6 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
| 7 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
| 8 | ZHONG Guoren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 10 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | LIGOS Alex M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 13 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 5% |
| 14 | BOYLE Aiden P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | LI Jinghua E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
| 16 | GUO Cheng Jin Morris | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 18 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
| 19 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 20 | XU Chi | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 21 | BADLANI Dev | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 21 | WANG Mason | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 23 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 16% |
| 25 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 26 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% |
| 27 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | SONG Austin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 29 | VENKATESH Aditya | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | GUO Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 31 | MENG Xiang | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | BAUMANN Gunnar | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 34 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 36 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 86% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | WANG Julang | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | XU Ethan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 40 | POIROT Max | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 42 | GUO Justin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 43 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 46 | JIE WanYue | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | SONG Yanchen | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | WEN Ethan | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 51 | WEI Qian | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | XU Feng | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | RYNSKI Gerik | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | NICOLL James | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 86% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.