San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZHENG Alan H. | V D V D D V | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
2 | ZENG Lucas H. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
3 | MAO Connor | V D V V D V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
3 | OH Samuel H. | V V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
5 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
7 | DIVITO Dylan | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
8 | XIAO EDWARD | D D V V V V | V V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
9 | GRANT Lachlan K. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
10 | ZHANG Luke T. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
12 | KUMBLA Samarth | V D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
13 | CHOI Ethan L. | V V D D V D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
14 | HUANG Bernard | V D D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
15 | WENDLER Alexander J. | V D V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
16 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | D V V D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
17 | SHIH William | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | DARIANO Noah G. | V V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
19 | OTAKE Jared K. | V V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
20 | CHOI Samuel | D V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
21 | SPEVAK Alexander | V V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
22 | HOBSON Aaron K. | V V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
23 | DESAI Nalin H. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
24 | BERMENDER Cameron | D D V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
25 | ANDRIONO Raymond Rafael | D V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
26 | LIN Dashiell | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
27 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
28 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
29 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | V V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
30 | DAVIS Christopher M. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
31 | YU Anders | D D D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
32 | PATINO Yahir | D V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
33 | AVRON Case B. | D V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
34 | WU Conrad J. | D V V D D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
35 | BALDWIN Timothy M. | D V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
36 | TSANG Matthew K. | D V V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
37 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
38 | MOHAMMAD Abdulwahab | V D D V D D | D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
39 | LIM Charles Q. | D D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
40 | SWEENEY Quentin | D D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
41 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
42 | NG Eben S. | V D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
43 | UZGIRIS Kovas | V D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
44 | SCHUR Skyler | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
45 | SHERMAN Marco J. | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
46 | VUKAZICH Carlo | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
47 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
48 | DANKAR Neel | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
49 | LEE Jesse | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
50 | BAEK David | D D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
51 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
51 | MU Jeffrey | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
53 | WONG Louis | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
54 | STIAGUN Nikita | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
55 | ARREDONDO Rafael | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.