San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 2 | ZENG Lucas H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 3 | MAO Connor | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 3 | OH Samuel H. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
| 5 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% |
| 6 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | DIVITO Dylan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 8 | XIAO EDWARD | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 9 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 10 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 11 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 12 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 13 | CHOI Ethan L. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 14 | HUANG Bernard | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 15 | WENDLER Alexander J. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 16 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | SHIH William | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 18 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 19 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 20 | CHOI Samuel | - | 3% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | SPEVAK Alexander | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 46% | 12% |
| 22 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 23 | DESAI Nalin H. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | BERMENDER Cameron | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 25 | ANDRIONO Raymond Rafael | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 26 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 27 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 28 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 29 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 30 | DAVIS Christopher M. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 31 | YU Anders | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 32 | PATINO Yahir | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | AVRON Case B. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 34 | WU Conrad J. | 2% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BALDWIN Timothy M. | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 37 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 10% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | MOHAMMAD Abdulwahab | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
| 39 | LIM Charles Q. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | SWEENEY Quentin | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 42 | NG Eben S. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | SCHUR Skyler | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | SHERMAN Marco J. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | VUKAZICH Carlo | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 47 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | DANKAR Neel | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 49 | LEE Jesse | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | BAEK David | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 25% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | MU Jeffrey | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | WONG Louis | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | STIAGUN Nikita | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | ARREDONDO Rafael | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.