San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NG Micah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 2 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 3 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 5 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 6 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | 6% | |
| 7 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
| 8 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 13% |
| 9 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 27% | |
| 10 | SONG Matthew | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 11 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 12 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 13 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 14 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 17 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 3% |
| 18 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 19 | SHEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 20 | TALWALKAR Vedant | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 21 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | DE RIDDER Nathan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | TSAGAAN Arthur | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 24 | PORPORA Oliver | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 25 | ARCARA Evan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | ZHANG Graham | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | UPENDER West | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | HE Bourne | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 79% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | TSAGAAN Alex | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 32 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ROSEN Benjamin | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | HAROLD, III Byron (Trey) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 35 | GITLER Lexin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | LEHTINEN Axel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 37 | NAIR Sujit | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 38 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 40 | JOERGENSEN Kai | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ANDRADE Cedric | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LO Liam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 44 | HE Ian | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | HOM Logan | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | FU Bryan | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | FRANCIA-COCHRANE Cooper | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CHUNG Chanwon | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | SHA Walter | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | GAUTAM Udyat | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 52 | LINDBERG Walter | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.