Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GARLINGTON David | V V V V D | V V V V V V | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
2 | REES Daniel I. | V V D V V D | V V V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
3 | WESTEN Zachary (Zack) C. | V D D V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
3 | WALSH Kevin | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
5 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
6 | MCGINNIS Aidan K. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
7 | SHUGART Henry R. | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
8 | CELECKI Barrett | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
9 | BRANDRETH Garret | V V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
10 | SUBRAMANIAN Arjuna | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
11 | POCHON Adam V. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
12 | CAMPBELL Grant M. | V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
13 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
14 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
15 | TAFOYA Devin D. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
16 | CHAN Andrew M. | V D D D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
17 | BOYCE Samuel H. | V V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
18 | MILLETT Seamus T. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
19 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
20 | ALLGEIER Peter | D V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
22 | CHERIS Zachariah A. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
23 | ANDERSON Brendan | V V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
23 | GOLDMAN Rami | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
25 | SMITH Jackson | D V D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
26 | KAJI Ty | D D V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
27 | SOLTER Kai | D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
28 | CLAYMAN John A. | V D V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
30 | ERKENBECK Nathan M. | D V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
31 | COLE Matthew | D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
32 | ANDERSON Henry | D V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
33 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | V D V D V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
34 | EBELL Ivan D. | V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
35 | WEBER Nora | V V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
36 | NIEMANN Avery | V D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
37 | BARON Sabina | V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
38 | HENDRICK Heidi M. | D V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
39 | STRAUSS Luke | D D V D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
40 | TIBBETTS Johnathan | D V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
41 | HARBIN Layla | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
42 | SAUTHOFF Chris | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
43 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
44 | BURCH Tristan H. | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
45 | GROGAN Hunter K. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
46 | ANDERSON Alan J. | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
47 | DAVIS Greg | D D D D V | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
48 | NIETZER Jo A. | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
49 | MOORE Hunter | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
50 | DAVIS Emma | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
51 | SCHELL Julia | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
52 | BRETT Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
53 | BRETT Mary | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
55 | LUTTON Patricia | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.