Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GARLINGTON David | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 2 | REES Daniel I. | - | - | - | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 3 | WESTEN Zachary (Zack) C. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 41% | 10% | |
| 3 | WALSH Kevin | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 5 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 32% | |
| 6 | MCGINNIS Aidan K. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 20% | |
| 7 | SHUGART Henry R. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% |
| 8 | CELECKI Barrett | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | BRANDRETH Garret | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 10 | SUBRAMANIAN Arjuna | - | - | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
| 11 | POCHON Adam V. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 12 | CAMPBELL Grant M. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
| 13 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | - | - | 6% | 37% | 45% | 12% | |
| 14 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 15 | TAFOYA Devin D. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 16 | CHAN Andrew M. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 17 | BOYCE Samuel H. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
| 18 | MILLETT Seamus T. | - | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 45% | 10% | |
| 20 | ALLGEIER Peter | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% |
| 22 | CHERIS Zachariah A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 23 | ANDERSON Brendan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 23 | GOLDMAN Rami | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 18% | 2% |
| 25 | SMITH Jackson | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 26 | KAJI Ty | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 27 | SOLTER Kai | 3% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | CLAYMAN John A. | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 30 | ERKENBECK Nathan M. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 31 | COLE Matthew | 4% | 26% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ANDERSON Henry | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 34 | EBELL Ivan D. | 6% | 31% | 43% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | WEBER Nora | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 36 | NIEMANN Avery | 1% | 9% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | BARON Sabina | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | HENDRICK Heidi M. | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | STRAUSS Luke | - | 7% | 41% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 40 | TIBBETTS Johnathan | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HARBIN Layla | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | SAUTHOFF Chris | 8% | 52% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 43 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 3% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | BURCH Tristan H. | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | GROGAN Hunter K. | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | ANDERSON Alan J. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 47 | DAVIS Greg | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | NIETZER Jo A. | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | MOORE Hunter | 11% | 64% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | DAVIS Emma | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SCHELL Julia | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | BRETT Joseph | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | BRETT Mary | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | LUTTON Patricia | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.