DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 1% |
| 2 | HITCHCOCK David | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 3 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% | |
| 5 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 6 | DOAN Joseph M. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 25% | |
| 7 | ADLER Ethan M. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 8 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 9 | LEE Shwan | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 10 | NOMANI Shibli D. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 11 | MIDDEKE Devin | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 12 | PYO Yunice | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 13 | WANG Tristan | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 15 | HUGHES Michael D. | 3% | 40% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 8% | |
| 19 | RHYU Kozmo | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 20 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 4% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | BANNEN Nicholas | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | EVANS Allen L. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | KING Cameron | - | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
| 25 | USDIN Anton | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | CHAWLA Ishika | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | LU Sebastian X. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | BAILEY Wade | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | PAULSON Connor M. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | BOLE Samuel B. | 36% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | MCLAREN Rachel | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | CHOI Marcus | 50% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | PANTEL Richard | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
| 34 | HARNEY John | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | FRENCH Phaelen | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MONTESI Eric | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | GALBIATI Leonardo | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
| 38 | STADNYK Katherine E. | 11% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.