DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 26% | 1% |
| 2 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 3 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 5 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 6 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 7 | ADLER Ethan M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 8 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 9 | LEE Shwan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 10 | NOMANI Shibli D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 11 | MIDDEKE Devin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 12 | PYO Yunice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | WANG Tristan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 15 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 97% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 17 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | DESAMOURS Georges H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% | |
| 19 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 20 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 21 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 22 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 24 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 25 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | CHAWLA Ishika | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | LU Sebastian X. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | BAILEY Wade | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | PAULSON Connor M. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | BOLE Samuel B. | 100% | 64% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | MCLAREN Rachel | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | CHOI Marcus | 100% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | PANTEL Richard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 34 | HARNEY John | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | FRENCH Phaelen | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | MONTESI Eric | 100% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | GALBIATI Leonardo | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 2% | |
| 38 | STADNYK Katherine E. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.