USA Fencing Baltimore SJCC Tournament

Junior Men's Saber

Saturday, February 29, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 FRISHMAN Ethan J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 28%
2 WOOD Elden S. 100% 100% 99% 94% 77% 43% 11%
3 BENAVRAM Lev C. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 9%
3 ZU Kevin 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 27%
5 NADILE Henry V. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 34%
6 BARNETT Adam 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 17%
7 MIKA Casper 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 27%
8 BASALYGA Jeffrey 100% 100% 100% 96% 82% 50% 15%
9 SINGER Carson 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 9%
10 MORREALE John 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 21% 3%
11 QUAN Nicholas 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
12 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 17%
13 HAMMER Peter A. 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
14 KIM Avery J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 19%
15 SHI Andrew 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 14%
16 LINSKY Matthew 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 24% 4%
17 ZHOU Matthew R. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 22%
18 LAI Adam J. 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 18%
19 CHAMBERS Amir E. 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 11%
20 KIM Minwook 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 11%
21 ZHOU Kevin 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
22 LO Joshua H. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 6%
23 LEE Kyle 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
24 YAO Jonathan 100% 100% 97% 84% 56% 23% 4%
25 GANTA Vijay 100% 97% 81% 47% 16% 2%
26 CHAN Matthew 100% 99% 94% 73% 40% 13% 2%
27 CHO Brandon 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
28 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. 100% 100% 100% 96% 77% 35%
29 LIU kelly 100% 97% 81% 48% 17% 3%
30 BARTOLO Domenic V. 100% 100% 94% 70% 34% 9% 1%
31 DODRILL Grant 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
32 STEINMETZ John 100% 99% 90% 61% 25% 5% -
33 JEAN Noe T. 100% 100% 99% 92% 72% 37% 9%
34 LAHOTSKA Yahor 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 26% 4%
35 LIN William 100% 99% 91% 69% 35% 10% 1%
36 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 94% 76% 43% 14% 2%
37 CHEN Oscar 100% 98% 82% 47% 14% 2%
37 QIU Le 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
39 ERACHSHAW Taras P. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 16%
40 HAMMERSTROM Jared 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 5%
41 RAI Avin 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 8%
42 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 98% 88% 61% 28% 7% 1%
43 HUDDY Brandon J. 100% 96% 68% 27% 5% 1% -
44 ZHOU Justin 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
45 MORRILL William 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 24% 4%
46 CHANG Eliot A. 100% 99% 89% 64% 30% 8% 1%
47 HOUTZ Jackson 100% 99% 93% 72% 39% 12% 2%
48 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. 100% 99% 90% 62% 28% 7% 1%
49 WOODWARD Dylan P. 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2%
50 YANG Richard 100% 92% 66% 30% 8% 1%
51 YEN Preston 100% 99% 87% 55% 19% 2%
52 COLE Alexander 100% 97% 80% 48% 17% 3% -
53 GINIS Nathan 100% 99% 90% 65% 31% 8% 1%
53 ALTIRS Alexander 100% 96% 78% 45% 16% 3% -
55 QIN Alexander 100% 84% 49% 17% 4% - -
56 JARAMILLO Tobias L. 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 2%
57 CHIN Matthew W. 100% 100% 96% 77% 41% 12% 1%
58 HUANG Tyler T. 100% 69% 28% 6% 1% - -
59 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 72% 26% 5% - - -
60 NOBLE Colin 100% 92% 56% 18% 3% - -
61 LEE Jude H. 100% 80% 38% 10% 1% -
62 BERMAN Luca 100% 95% 75% 41% 14% 2% -
63 GREENBAUM Ian L. 100% 84% 48% 17% 3% - -
64 KOGAN Benjamin 100% 98% 84% 53% 21% 4% -
65 CHEONG Heonjae 100% 98% 81% 46% 15% 3% -
66 WIND Nicky E. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 43% 10%
67 HUSSAIN Faaris 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 6%
68 TONG Qilin 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 29%
69 WILSON Jude 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 10%
70 KENNEDY Liam A. 100% 89% 58% 23% 5% -
71 LEONARD Cole 100% 95% 71% 32% 7% 1%
72 NG Jonathan H. 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
73 REN Richard 100% 63% 21% 4% - - -
74 FLORES Peter D. 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
75 BUKOWSKI Bronson 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
76 RABINKOV Anthony 100% 99% 94% 75% 42% 13% 2%
77 WOODWARD Connor 100% 99% 92% 70% 36% 10% 1%
78 PAN Andrew W. 100% 95% 74% 41% 14% 2% -
79 GHENEA George Philipe 100% 91% 63% 29% 8% 1% -
80 GILES Jeremy M. 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 32% 7%
81 PANDEY Neil 100% 75% 30% 6% 1% - -
82 LU Timothy 100% 98% 86% 57% 24% 6% 1%
83 GILMORE Thomas W. 100% 100% 95% 75% 42% 13% 2%
84 SIMAK Joseph P. 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% -
85 WUN William 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2%
86 JIANG Kevin 100% 87% 50% 16% 2% -
87 EPSTEIN Henry N. 100% 92% 63% 27% 7% 1% -
88 DIACOS Jordan 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 5%
89 ZHOU Miles 100% 91% 63% 28% 8% 1% -
90 HARGENRADER Kailen A. 100% 99% 92% 69% 36% 10% 1%
91 NIL Michael Y. 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
92 HONG Steven 100% 84% 48% 16% 3% -
93 GRASS James D. 100% 94% 70% 35% 11% 2% -
94 NEVILLE James 100% 65% 20% 3% - - -
95 LEDERER Justin W. 100% 73% 32% 8% 1% - -
96 CHAVES Matthew J. 100% 90% 55% 20% 4% - -
96 KEEFE Duncan 100% 100% 95% 73% 37% 10% 1%
98 LEE Justin 100% 96% 70% 32% 8% 1% -
99 COSGROVE Connor R. 100% 73% 28% 6% 1% - -
100 CHENG Kyle 100% 67% 26% 6% 1% - -
101 LO Alexander 100% 77% 31% 7% 1% - -
102 MAKLIN Edward P. 100% 82% 42% 11% 1% -
102 TEVEBAUGH Andrew 100% 76% 33% 7% 1% -
104 GEORGE Daniel 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
105 LEE Aydan J. 100% 95% 72% 37% 12% 2% -
106 COX Luis E. 100% 67% 21% 3% - - -
107 MOLINARO Lawrence 100% 46% 9% 1% - - -
108 WALKER Robert Connor 100% 94% 70% 36% 11% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.