Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
2 | WOOD Elden S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
3 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
3 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
5 | NADILE Henry V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
6 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
7 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 27% |
8 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
9 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
10 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
11 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
12 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
13 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
14 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
15 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
16 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
17 | ZHOU Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
18 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
19 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
20 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
21 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
22 | LO Joshua H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% |
23 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
24 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
25 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
26 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
27 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
28 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
29 | LIU kelly | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | |
30 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
31 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
32 | STEINMETZ John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
33 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
34 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
35 | LIN William | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
36 | MORRILL Justin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
37 | CHEN Oscar | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
37 | QIU Le | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
39 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
40 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
41 | RAI Avin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
42 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
43 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - |
44 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
45 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
46 | CHANG Eliot A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
47 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
48 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
49 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
50 | YANG Richard | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
51 | YEN Preston | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
52 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
53 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
53 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
55 | QIN Alexander | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
56 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
57 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
58 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
59 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 72% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
60 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
61 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
62 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
63 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
64 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
65 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
66 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
67 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
68 | TONG Qilin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
69 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
70 | KENNEDY Liam A. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
71 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
72 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
73 | REN Richard | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
74 | FLORES Peter D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
75 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
76 | RABINKOV Anthony | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
77 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
78 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
79 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
80 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
81 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
82 | LU Timothy | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
83 | GILMORE Thomas W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
84 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
85 | WUN William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
86 | JIANG Kevin | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
87 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
88 | DIACOS Jordan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
89 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
90 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
91 | NIL Michael Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
92 | HONG Steven | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
93 | GRASS James D. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
94 | NEVILLE James | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
95 | LEDERER Justin W. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
96 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 90% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
96 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
98 | LEE Justin | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
99 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 100% | 73% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
100 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 67% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
101 | LO Alexander | 100% | 77% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
102 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
102 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
104 | GEORGE Daniel | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
105 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
106 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
107 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
108 | WALKER Robert Connor | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.