Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | - | 18% | 82% |
| 2 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% | |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 5 | PAI Lakshan K. | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 6 | REEVES Liam | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 25% | |
| 7 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 8 | GOGOI Vir K. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 9 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 15% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 10 | FINDLAY Zachary | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 11 | WONG Antonio | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 39% | 5% | |
| 12 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 3% | 22% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 13 | ALLEN Henry G. | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 10% | - | |
| 14 | ANTONUCCI Suren | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - |
| 15 | HAN Derek | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 2% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | DEDENBACH Joseph | 2% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 18 | KELLY Tommy | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | HEYBOER Jason | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | KNIGHT Michael | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 21 | MINOR David | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CAZER Mosby | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 23 | DUNLAP Ian | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | REAUME Nate | 37% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 25 | MCISAAC Finn | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.