Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 82% |
| 2 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 3 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 5 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 6 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% | |
| 7 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 8 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 9 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 10 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 11 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 5% | |
| 12 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 13 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 11% | - | |
| 14 | ANTONUCCI Suren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | - |
| 15 | HAN Derek | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | DEDENBACH Joseph | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 18 | KELLY Tommy | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | KNIGHT Michael | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | - | |
| 21 | MINOR David | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CAZER Mosby | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 23 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 25 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.