Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 2 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 19% |
| 3 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% |
| 3 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 5 | GRIFFITH JACK | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | |
| 6 | KASI Sanjay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
| 7 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 8% |
| 8 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 17% | |
| 9 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 55% | |
| 10 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 26% | 2% |
| 11 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 11% |
| 12 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | |
| 13 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 96% | 68% | 24% | 3% | |
| 14 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 30% | |
| 15 | CHEN Ziyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 16 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 11% |
| 17 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | < 1% | |
| 18 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 23% | |
| 19 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 46% | |
| 20 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 27% | |
| 21 | NEWELL Ian A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 6% |
| 22 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 23 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 89% | 48% | 9% | - | |
| 24 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 2% |
| 25 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 91% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 28 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 1% | - |
| 29 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | 7% | |
| 30 | CANO Diego A. | 100% | 98% | 72% | 17% | 1% | |
| 31 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 99% | 73% | 24% | 3% | |
| 32 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 83% | 27% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
| 34 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 35 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 3% | - |
| 36 | GAO William | 100% | 81% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 99% | 57% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 40% | 6% | |
| 39 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 5% | - |
| 40 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 98% | 81% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 41 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 88% | 34% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 43 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 44 | PAN Henry | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | WANG Winston | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 48 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | KUMAMOTO Sota | 100% | 91% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 51 | SONG Austin | 100% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | JOHN AYI Neville Pascal | 100% | 81% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | LI Lianhao | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.