Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
| 2 | MITCHELL Philip D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
| 3 | CHEN Ziyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | |
| 3 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 5 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 6 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 6% | |
| 7 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | |
| 8 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 19% | |
| 9 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% |
| 10 | BUERGIN Aidan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 11 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 43% | |
| 12 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 18% | |
| 13 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 10% | |
| 14 | ZHANG Andy W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | |
| 15 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 19% |
| 16 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | |
| 17 | GRIFFITH JACK | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 28% | |
| 18 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 12% | |
| 19 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 68% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | - |
| 22 | ROUNTREE Rob | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 23 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 100% | 92% | 58% | 16% | 1% | |
| 24 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 95% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 25 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 22% | 2% | |
| 26 | KOBAL Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 73% | 28% | 4% | |
| 27 | NEWELL Ian A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 5% | |
| 28 | LEE Lukas | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 94% | 62% | 20% | 2% | |
| 30 | WHITEHEAD Amir | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | 3% | |
| 31 | CAI Oliver K. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 90% | 51% | 10% | - | |
| 34 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 91% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
| 35 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 99% | 70% | 25% | 3% | |
| 36 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 84% | 39% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | CANO Diego A. | 100% | 68% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DABNEY Justin | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | PAULSON Connor M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | |
| 41 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 65% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | WALTER Evran M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 4% | |
| 44 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | - | - |
| 46 | JOHN AYI Neville Pascal | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.