The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 2 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 3 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 7% | |
| 5 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
| 6 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% |
| 7 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 11% |
| 8 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 9 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 10 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 11 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 12 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 13 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 14 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 15 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 16 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 9% | |
| 17 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 18 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
| 19 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% |
| 20 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | |
| 21 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 22 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 3% |
| 25 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 14% | |
| 26 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
| 27 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 28 | DANIEL Nikith | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SHEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 30 | PARK Rion | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% |
| 32 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% |
| 33 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 35 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | DULAI Angad | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 37 | LI Richard | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HE Ian | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | KAWADA Sebastien | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 40 | MORROW Sean | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | 2% | |
| 42 | ZHANG Graham | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 44 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 22% |
| 45 | WONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% |
| 46 | PARK William | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 47 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | LEHTINEN Axel | 100% | 97% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 52 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | JEONG Taewoo | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 56 | CHEN David | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
| 58 | HE Bourne | 100% | 82% | 27% | 3% | - | - | |
| 59 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 60 | LE Jacob | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 61 | FU Bryan | 100% | 87% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 63 | ZHANG Max | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 65 | UPENDER West | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 68 | PARK Roy | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 69 | WANG rainier | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 71 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 72 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | ANDRADE Cedric | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | HOM Logan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | CHEN Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 76 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 77 | SONG Matthew | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 78 | WANDJI NANA Noah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 79 | WU Thomas | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | BANUELOS Dario | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | LIM Zachary | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 83 | DENG David | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 84 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 85 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 87 | YAN Rian | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | FOY Grant | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.