Fairfield, CT - Fairfield, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 2 | CHAN Tyler | 2% | 20% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 3 | KAO Castor T. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | |
| 3 | KWON Ethan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 10% |
| 5 | FURST Matthew C. | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | < 1% | |
| 6 | DU Samuel R. | - | - | 5% | 36% | 48% | 10% | |
| 7 | ZHANG Henry C. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | KAZA Nitish | - | - | 2% | 26% | 55% | 16% | |
| 10 | NAGER Noah | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | - | 4% | 30% | 49% | 17% | |
| 12 | BAS Liam | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
| 13 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 1% | 14% | 63% | 23% | |
| 14 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 15 | BREIER Matthew F. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | JIANG Owen | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 24% | |
| 17 | LI Owen | - | - | - | 6% | 36% | 57% | |
| 18 | VITKAUSKAS Justin G. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | BING Charles | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 20 | SHIN Joshua J. | 1% | 15% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | PITERBARG Maxim | 7% | 38% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | ZHOU Andrew C. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | LI Eric | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 24 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | GUO Sean | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 26 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | 6% | 29% | 52% | 13% | 1% | |
| 27 | GOOR Julian | - | - | 3% | 22% | 51% | 24% | |
| 28 | BAO Wenyuan | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 29 | BAE Kevin | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | ACHILOV Sayid | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 31 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 3% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | QI Steve | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | VALENTON Timothy | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Gerald Y. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 35 | TALLARICO Matthew | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | CATINO Brennen | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 38 | HANSEN William | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | BOYLE Aiden P. | 17% | 52% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | BENATER Adam | 16% | 45% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 41 | MOCCO Jared | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | MENG Zhaoyi | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 43 | DE JAGER Robert | 8% | 52% | 37% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | MORGESON Colin | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.