Fairfield, CT - Fairfield, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% |
2 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 5% | - | |
3 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
3 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 10% |
5 | FURST Matthew C. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | < 1% | |
6 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% | 10% | |
7 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
8 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
9 | KAZA Nitish | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | 16% | |
10 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
11 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 17% | |
12 | BAS Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | |
13 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 23% | |
14 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
15 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
16 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
17 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | |
18 | VITKAUSKAS Justin G. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
19 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 7% | |
20 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
21 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 93% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | |
22 | ZHOU Andrew C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
23 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
24 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
25 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% | |
26 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 13% | 1% | |
27 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 24% | |
28 | BAO Wenyuan | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
29 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
30 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | - |
31 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | QI Steve | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | |
33 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | |
34 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
35 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | CATINO Brennen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
38 | HANSEN William | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
39 | BOYLE Aiden P. | 100% | 83% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
40 | BENATER Adam | 100% | 84% | 40% | 6% | - | - | |
41 | MOCCO Jared | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
42 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
43 | DE JAGER Robert | 100% | 92% | 40% | 3% | - | - | |
44 | MORGESON Colin | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.