Houston, TX - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FRAY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
| 2 | SENNEWALD Frederick A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 11% |
| 3 | IMREK Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 3 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | |
| 5 | GRAY Sterling B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | |
| 6 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 7 | MUGA Boris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 8 | YOUNG Peyton E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 27% | |
| 9 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 18% | |
| 10 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 17% | |
| 11 | SHETTY Surya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | KARKI Salyan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 20% | 2% | |
| 13 | GUNDA Saketh | 100% | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 14 | BARGE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 15 | SENNEWALD James J. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 16 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
| 17 | JAYENDRA Chandrashekar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% | |
| 18 | ODEN Isaac M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 10% | |
| 19 | JAAFAR Omar | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 20 | PARKER Riley D. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 21 | SURESH NEERAJ | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | SCHULZE Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
| 23 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 82% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 27 | HERNANDEZ Cole F. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 81% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | RANDOLPH Ian | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | GAITHER Christopher W. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | STANTIAL Grant | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | ALI Zane R. | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | MADDUX Bryce | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | WEN Ethan | 100% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.