Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 2 | OURSLER Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 16% |
| 3 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 3 | GRIFFIN John O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 5 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 6 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 7 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 9 | ZOBEL Eric H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 51% | 12% |
| 10 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 11 | GEE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
| 12 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 14 | BOBROW Logan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 18 | DESANDO Michael R. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
| 20 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 22 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 23 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 24 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | RITCHIE Luke W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 27 | YI Stephen K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
| 28 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 29 | DOBBINS Evan W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 34 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 34 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 37 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 38 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 39 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 40 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 41 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 22% |
| 42 | LIAO Alex J. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 44 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 46 | LI Simon A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 47 | LEWIS Paul D. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 48 | NEWELL Ian A. | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 50 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 51 | LIU Eric Y. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | DIVENTI Paul W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 53 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 55 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 56 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | ANDERSON Colton J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 58 | SIEGEL Elliot | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 59 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 5% |
| 60 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 61 | DESHMUKH Ayush | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 62 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 63 | LI Eric | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 65 | BLUTT Emerson B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 66 | KIM Isaiah G. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
| 68 | SHAFAIE Ali | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
| 69 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 70 | HODESS Ethan | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 72 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 73 | GARLINGTON David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 74 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 75 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 76 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 77 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 78 | BRANDT-OGMAN Adlai | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 78 | TIAN Aaron C. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 80 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | JOSEPH Willem | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 82 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 83 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 84 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 85 | WESTPHAL David R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 86 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 87 | SICHITIU Alexander | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 88 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 89 | MOORE Jeremy S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 90 | GATZA Logan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 91 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 92 | LEE Chris | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 93 | HAN Andersen Y. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 94 | YU Jonathan J. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 95 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 96 | BERK Theodore | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | SHAJI Karthik | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 97 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 99 | JEFFERY Jakob | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 100 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 101 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 102 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 103 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 104 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 105 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 95% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 106 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 87% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 107 | EUSCHER Alex M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 108 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 108 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 110 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 111 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 113 | MILLER Trent D. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 114 | PRASANNA Advaith | 100% | 76% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 115 | RINEHART Conner M. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 116 | JAUME Andrei | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 117 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.