Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NORCONK Claire R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | |
2 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
3 | BONDAR Nika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
3 | FENG ge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
5 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
6 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
7 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
8 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 20% |
9 | BOK Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
10 | MCSHINE Katelyn H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
11 | YOU Emily | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
12 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
13 | PALANSKI Cate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
14 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
15 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
16 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
17 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
18 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
19 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
20 | TAYLOR Beth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
21 | MORIN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
22 | DOERR Zoe | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
23 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 8% |
24 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
25 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
26 | LESPERANCE Jordan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
28 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
29 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
30 | CAVANAUGH Evelyn R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
31 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
32 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
33 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
34 | BENZAN India | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 3% | |
35 | UPHAM Karolyn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
36 | DUARTE-GARCIA Zoya A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
37 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
38 | PEARSON Heila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
39 | GROSSL Karina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
40 | MCGEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
41 | MILEWSKI Samantha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
41 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | APPLEBEE Andralyn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
44 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | |
45 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
46 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
47 | LI Alisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
48 | BOLES Savvianna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
49 | SHEIN Evita | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
50 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
51 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
52 | HILLYER Megan | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
53 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
54 | WIESSLER-HUGHES Linda | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
55 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
56 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
57 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
58 | CAI Catelynn | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
59 | FLANIGAN KENDRA | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
60 | PARKS Eliana | 100% | 88% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
61 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
62 | HIRSCH Naomi B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
63 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
64 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
65 | NAROTZKY Emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
66 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
67 | ZOU Jiayi-Hannah | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | |
68 | ARAYE Nasro | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 3% |
69 | RIST Rebecca (Beck) J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
70 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
71 | SHUKLA Tanya | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
72 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | HAYDEN Molly | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
74 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
75 | GELMAN Emily | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
76 | DONDISCH Andrea | 100% | 60% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
77 | MEZACK Nicole | 100% | 91% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
77 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
79 | BARREIRO Katrina | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
80 | SOTELO Michelle | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
81 | BENJAMIN Stephanie | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
81 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
83 | TOFFELMIRE Amelia A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
84 | SHICK Klaudia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
84 | UNGURIANU Nika | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
86 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
86 | FRIEDLANDER Sarah | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
86 | KIM Lynne | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
89 | AUCHTERLONIE Seven | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
90 | MAGALSKI Mary | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
91 | GARTNER Kacie | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
92 | RYDMAN Grace | 100% | 92% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | |
93 | STECKMEISTER Evelyn | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% | - | |
94 | CAPEZZA Olivia | 100% | 72% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.