Garfield, NJ - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HERGERT Benito | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
2 | KIM William M. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
3 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
3 | BHATNAGAR Ayan | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
5 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
6 | JUN Jaywu | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
7 | KOKENGE Reid | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
8 | SMITH Nicholas S. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
9 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% | |
10 | JACKSON Anthony I. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
11 | MISHIMA Torata | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
12 | WANG Eric S | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
13 | LIU Frank | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
14 | HE Lawrence | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
15 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
16 | GAO Daniel | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
17 | KUMAR Anitya | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
18 | FALBERG Andrew | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
19 | PARK Frederick | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
20 | ROWE Jason | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | KIM Tei D. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
22 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
23 | SHEN Max | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
24 | PERSAUD Daivik | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% | |
25 | WANG Max S | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
26 | LI Jeffrey | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.