RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 2 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 3 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 5 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 6 | FELAND Alexandra | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 8 | MORALES GUTIERREZ Maria Fernanda | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 9 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% | |
| 10 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 11 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 12 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 47% | 14% |
| 13 | LEE Natasha | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 14 | LEE Olivia | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 15 | WANG Angelina | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LIN Ashley | 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 17 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 18 | MUN Brianna K. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 19 | WEBER Nora | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 20 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 21 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 22 | BUSH Emma | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 24 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | PECK Maia A. | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | HUANG Lanlan | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 28 | DALEY Keira | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | GULLY Wren | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHANG mickey | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 32 | HSIU Elizabeth | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | BARBARA Camille | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 34 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 35 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | YAO Yilin | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 37 | CHA Eugenie | 12% | 32% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | DU Shunyi（Wendy） | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | ANDERSON Claire | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 41 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | TAN Jocelyn | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 44 | NASON Amelia | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | LOUIE Sarah | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | HAU Olivia | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | ESTRADA Ariana | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | MITRANI Gabriela | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | RUIZ Lusciana | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | HSU Adele Y. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LI Vivian | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | XU Katelyn | 4% | 30% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | KAUSHISH Sara | 6% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.