RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 2 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 3 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 3 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 5 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 6 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 7 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 8 | MORALES GUTIERREZ Maria Fernanda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 9 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 10 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 11 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 12 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 14% |
| 13 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 15 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 17 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 18 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 19 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 20 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 21 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 24 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 28 | DALEY Keira | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | GULLY Wren | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | ZHANG mickey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 95% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 34 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 39 | DU Shunyi（Wendy） | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 41 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 43 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | NASON Amelia | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | ESTRADA Ariana | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | MITRANI Gabriela | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 49 | RUIZ Lusciana | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | HSU Adele Y. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LI Vivian | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 96% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | KAUSHISH Sara | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.