Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
| 2 | SCHWIEBERT Michael F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | |
| 3 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 3 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
| 5 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% | |
| 6 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 7 | O'BARR Kieran C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
| 8 | MO Jason | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | |
| 9 | CHI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 9% | |
| 10 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | |
| 11 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 12 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 13 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 95% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 14 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | TAN Peter | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 16 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% |
| 17 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 19 | OH Jaden | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
| 21 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 91% | 59% | 20% | 3% | |
| 22 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 24 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | QUITORIANO Matthew | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 98% | 76% | 32% | 5% | |
| 28 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | 100% | 93% | 57% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | ALDERSON Joseph R. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | BROWN Darius D. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 31 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | QUITORIANO Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
| 33 | GUO Hairuo | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | PARK Sky | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | |
| 35 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | BERSHIN Izzy | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | RAMOS Jaydon | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 80% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.