Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 2 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
| 3 | MORGAN Quinlyn (Quin) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 65% | 9% |
| 3 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 5 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
| 6 | GRIFFIN John O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 7 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 21% | 1% |
| 8 | LU Yikai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 9 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
| 10 | YI Stephen K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 11 | WHEELOCK Bryan M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 2% | - |
| 12 | LIU Jonathan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 13 | JU Alexander (Alex) Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 14 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% |
| 15 | MICKELSON Jacob P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 3% |
| 16 | PAI Dong-Ying | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | BAILEY William F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | |
| 18 | QUINONES Diego A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | 16% | 1% |
| 19 | GONZALEZ Eric J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
| 20 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 52% | 9% | |
| 20 | UPTON Craig | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | TRASCHENKO POCHMARA Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
| 23 | PORRAS Cristian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 24 | BALL James T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 13% | |
| 25 | WANG Eric J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 7% | |
| 26 | AMMON Blue | 100% | 86% | 42% | 6% | - | - | |
| 27 | SMITH Erick | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 29 | WANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 84% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 54% | 11% | |
| 31 | DEDENBACH Joseph | 100% | 91% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MILLER Douglas S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 6% |
| 34 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 35 | CAHILL Nicholas D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
| 36 | LOVIN Vlad | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% | - |
| 37 | SINHA Verdhaan | 100% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 39 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | EUH Jason | 100% | 80% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 43 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 100% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | BARCA Bryant | 100% | 93% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | SCHROM Andrew | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | FISHER Austin D. | 100% | 76% | 29% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | LIU Jacob B. | 100% | 93% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | WALKER Andrew J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 49 | BOYKO Miles | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CHEZ Nolan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | TALASILA Arush | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | LABOW Howard B. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ZHAO Bowen | 100% | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ROBINSON Matthew | 100% | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | VAGGALIS Denny | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | KIM Jun Young | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | METTE Russell | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.