Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHAH S Ayush | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 2 | SMITH Jackson | D V V V D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 3 | SILVERS Noah E. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 5 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | HEIM Bryce | V V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 7 | WU Byron | V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | DIVERIS Joseph | V D D V D | V V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 9 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | V V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 10 | KRZYSIAK David F. | D V V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 11 | KRISTIANSEN Phillip | D V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | OH Matthew M. | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 13 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | D V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 14 | NGUYEN Tate | D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 15 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 16 | LOISEAU Eliott | D D D D V | V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 17 | MILLER Lance W. | V V V V V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 18 | SATTERFIELD Donald | V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 19 | MCKEEVER Luca | V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | D D V V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | MEDINA Michael A. | D D D V V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | VEZMAR Evan H. | V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 23 | THOMAS Samuel | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | WANG David | D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | NIKOLOV Peter | D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | V D D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 28 | PRABHAKAR Agasthya | D V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 29 | LI Chenyu | V V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | TOPAZ Nicholas | D D V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 31 | DENNIS Ethan | D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | LITWILLER Joseph | D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 33 | BRADFORD Ethan | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 34 | SONN Rohan | V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 35 | CORRALES Victor M. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 36 | TASKIRAN Mete | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 37 | SAHA Sayan | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.