Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | LI Eric | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | AHN Jun | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | LEE Jacob J | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
5 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
6 | LI Owen | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
7 | WANG Mason | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
8 | BING Charles | D V D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
9 | GONG Benjamin | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
10 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
10 | GU Andrew | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
10 | LEE Jonah | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
13 | PO Oliver | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
14 | MCLEAN Miles K. | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
15 | MENG Zhaoyi | V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
16 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
17 | ALIMI Yacine A. | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
18 | CAMAYO GUERRERO ISAAC | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
19 | TAHOUN Mostafa | V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | GLEBA Nico | V V V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
21 | JIN Dennis H. | D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
22 | ZHEN Ethan | V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
23 | SIMA Congyu Josh | D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
24 | TSAI Max W. | V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
25 | SHAO Eric | V D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
26 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
27 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | V D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
28 | SHA Yi Peng | D V D V D | V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
29 | SHIN Joshua J. | V D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
30 | LI Aaron | D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
30 | ACHILOV Sayid | D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
32 | WU Michael | V D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
33 | JIANG Owen | D V D V D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
34 | PAN Eric | D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
35 | GARDINER Luke J. | D D V D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
36 | LACHAPELLE Cole | D V V D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
37 | XU Ethan | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
38 | HOLCOMB Cedric | D V D D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
39 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D V D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
40 | LI Ayren | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
41 | PELT Ethan T. | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
41 | DENG Kenny | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
43 | BOSSONG Reagan | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
44 | DANGELO Connor | D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
45 | BISHOP Henry | D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
46 | SUTARIA Julian | D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
47 | SOLOPOULOS James | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
48 | EBERMAN Henry | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
49 | LAGASSE Jack T. | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
49 | RNO Kyler | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
49 | KIMBALL Curtis | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
49 | SURESH Rohan | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
49 | TIBBETTS Justin | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
54 | BALDWIN Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
55 | CANEDO James | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.