Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | EMMER Chase T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% |
2 | ZHANG Daniel D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
3 | UM Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% |
5 | LIU Niles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
6 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% |
7 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 6% |
8 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 16% | 1% |
9 | HO Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 26% |
10 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 54% | |
11 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 13% |
12 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% |
13 | SULLIVAN Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
14 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 42% | 2% |
15 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 77% | 30% | 2% | |
16 | LIU Patrick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
17 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
18 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% | 4% |
19 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 25% |
20 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 12% |
21 | HOWARD Michael | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 9% | - |
22 | MCLEAN Miles K. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 5% | - |
23 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | 6% |
24 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 86% | 42% | 4% | |
25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 32% | |
26 | HAMILTON Bogdan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
27 | SEZER Kaya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 13% |
28 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% |
29 | WANG Mason | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - |
30 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 37% | 6% |
31 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 20% | - |
32 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 8% |
33 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
34 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 11% | 1% |
35 | PO Oliver | 100% | 99% | 87% | 38% | 7% | - |
36 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 17% | 1% |
37 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 92% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - |
38 | TSAI Max W. | 100% | 97% | 46% | 5% | - | |
39 | GU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 84% | 41% | 9% | - |
40 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | - |
41 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | 100% | 92% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - |
42 | PAN Eric | 100% | 99% | 79% | 36% | 6% | - |
43 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | 2% |
44 | KLOSTERMANN Max | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
45 | THADHANI Elio | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
46 | JIN Dennis H. | 100% | 87% | 36% | 5% | - | - |
47 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 94% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - |
48 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 99% | 65% | 11% | - | |
49 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 97% | 58% | 15% | 1% | |
50 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 96% | 70% | 22% | 2% | - |
51 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 95% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - |
52 | ALIMI Yacine A. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 7% | - |
53 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
53 | VALENTON Timothy | 100% | 85% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 99% | 79% | 36% | 7% | - |
56 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 90% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - |
57 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | - |
58 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - |
59 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 58% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
60 | BERGERON Justin | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | |
61 | XU Ethan | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
62 | GARDOS Noah | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
63 | WU Michael | 100% | 71% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
64 | LICCIARDI Davin | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - |
65 | BILODEAU Leo | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | GLEBA Nico | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
67 | DALOMBA Kingston | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
68 | BOUSSY Luciano | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
68 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
70 | CANEDO James | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.