Boston Fencing Club RJCC

Junior Men's Foil

Sunday, October 10, 2021 at 8:00 AM

Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 EMMER Chase T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93%
2 ZHANG Daniel D. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 60%
3 UM Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 59%
3 LI Richard 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 48%
5 LIU Niles J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
6 KAO Castor T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 49%
7 LI Owen 100% 100% 98% 84% 45% 6%
8 JIANG Owen 100% 99% 89% 55% 16% 1%
9 HO Ryan J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 26%
10 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. 100% 100% 100% 95% 54%
11 MAGIDSON Gabriel 100% 100% 100% 92% 59% 13%
12 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 45%
13 SULLIVAN Jackson R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 49%
14 BING Charles 100% 100% 98% 85% 42% 2%
15 GONG Benjamin 100% 99% 77% 30% 2%
16 LIU Patrick 100% 100% 100% 98% 75%
17 LIN Richard W. 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 39%
18 AHN Jun 100% 100% 98% 84% 38% 4%
19 WU Alexander 100% 100% 100% 97% 75% 25%
20 BAE Kevin 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 12%
21 HOWARD Michael 100% 99% 83% 43% 9% -
22 MCLEAN Miles K. 100% 97% 75% 33% 5% -
23 DEGREMONT Henri S. 100% 100% 99% 88% 46% 6%
24 COSTELLO Chaissen F. 100% 100% 86% 42% 4%
25 SCHENCK Koen M. 100% 100% 99% 88% 32%
26 HAMILTON Bogdan A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 71%
27 SEZER Kaya 100% 100% 99% 92% 60% 13%
28 SHA Yi Peng 100% 100% 99% 88% 54% 13%
29 WANG Mason 100% 97% 76% 36% 7% -
30 LI Eric 100% 100% 99% 82% 37% 6%
31 SHIN Joshua J. 100% 100% 93% 66% 20% -
32 FOGELSON Frederick J. 100% 100% 99% 88% 51% 8%
33 BOOTSMA Shane-Anson 100% 99% 90% 49% 11% 1%
34 BARTEL Jacob L. 100% 99% 87% 48% 11% 1%
35 PO Oliver 100% 99% 87% 38% 7% -
36 ACHILOV Sayid 100% 100% 92% 59% 17% 1%
37 LIGH Thomas 100% 92% 55% 15% 2% -
38 TSAI Max W. 100% 97% 46% 5% -
39 GU Andrew 100% 99% 84% 41% 9% -
40 TAHOUN Mostafa 100% 98% 81% 41% 8% -
41 SYOMICHEV Gleb A. 100% 92% 56% 17% 2% -
42 PAN Eric 100% 99% 79% 36% 6% -
43 LEE Jacob J 100% 100% 95% 71% 25% 2%
44 KLOSTERMANN Max 100% 94% 68% 31% 8% 1%
45 THADHANI Elio 100% 99% 84% 45% 11% 1%
46 JIN Dennis H. 100% 87% 36% 5% - -
47 MILLER Aidan A. 100% 94% 64% 22% 3% -
48 SIMA Congyu Josh 100% 99% 65% 11% -
49 DOCTOR Aidan L. 100% 97% 58% 15% 1%
50 MENG Zhaoyi 100% 96% 70% 22% 2% -
51 ZHAO Jesse 100% 95% 56% 15% 1% -
52 ALIMI Yacine A. 100% 98% 79% 38% 7% -
53 KITAGAWA Eric S. 100% 86% 48% 14% 2% -
53 VALENTON Timothy 100% 85% 42% 9% 1% -
55 ZHEN Ethan 100% 99% 79% 36% 7% -
56 WOODTHORPE Michael G. 100% 90% 44% 10% 1% -
57 KONG Luculentus X. 100% 48% 7% - - -
58 ZHUANG Chuanxuan 100% 35% 4% - - -
59 RNO Kyler 100% 58% 11% 1% - -
60 BERGERON Justin 100% 8% - - -
61 XU Ethan 100% 62% 18% 2% - -
62 GARDOS Noah 100% 25% 2% - - -
63 WU Michael 100% 71% 16% 1% - -
64 LICCIARDI Davin 100% 42% 7% - - -
65 BILODEAU Leo 100% 81% 38% 8% 1% -
66 GLEBA Nico 100% 16% 1% - -
67 DALOMBA Kingston 100% 73% 29% 6% 1% -
68 BOUSSY Luciano 100% 53% 13% 1% - -
68 DENG Kenny 100% 56% 14% 1% - -
70 CANEDO James 100% 12% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.