Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 24% | |
| 2 | BESSIRE Nolan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 52% | |
| 3 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 3 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 10% |
| 5 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 3% |
| 6 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 7 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
| 8 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 66% | |
| 9 | WONG Adam L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 11% |
| 10 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 11 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 27% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Nicholas Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 9% | |
| 13 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 14 | NAGIMOV Marsel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 5% |
| 15 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 16 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
| 17 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 18 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 20 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
| 21 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 22 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | ||
| 23 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 24 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | - |
| 25 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 26 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | SONG Dylan S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 30 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | PIESNER Joshua C. | 100% | 87% | 48% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 34 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 18% |
| 35 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 9% | |
| 36 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 37 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 38 | JEAN Noe T. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 40 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 40 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 42 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% |
| 43 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 90% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 85% | 42% | 8% | - | ||
| 47 | CHEN Bryce | 100% | 96% | 69% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 25% | |
| 49 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 50 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 51 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 5% | - | |
| 52 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 91% | 56% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WHITE Austin M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 57 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 58 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 59 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 60 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 99% | 83% | 38% | 5% | ||
| 61 | SIEGEL William P. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 62 | CHOU Jared T. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | OH Joshua | 100% | 82% | 28% | 3% | - | - | |
| 64 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% | |
| 66 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 67 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 68 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 70 | TAN Christien | 100% | 87% | 46% | 10% | - | - | |
| 71 | MEJIA Matthew D. | 100% | 89% | 53% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 72 | WOO Christian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 73 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | KIM Banseok | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 76 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 77 | LO Conrad | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 78 | KUO Evan | 100% | 88% | 40% | 6% | - | ||
| 79 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 80 | NAM Michael | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 83 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 49% | 9% | - | - | - | |
| 84 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.