2018 Gerrie Baumgart SYC/RCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, October 20, 2018 at 8:00 AM

Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GRANT Lachlan K. 100% 100% 100% 99% 83% 24%
2 BESSIRE Nolan S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 52%
3 LA ROSA Federico 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 38%
3 KIM Brandon J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 47% 10%
5 TSANG Matthew K. 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 27% 3%
6 DARIANO Noah G. 100% 100% 94% 70% 31% 5%
7 ZENG Lucas H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 57%
8 DESERANNO Jeidus 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 66%
9 WONG Adam L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 55% 11%
10 BURKE Spencer W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 54%
11 KUMBLA Samarth 100% 100% 100% 99% 84% 27%
12 ZHANG Nicholas Z. 100% 100% 99% 87% 47% 9%
13 HOOSHI Dylan M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
14 NAGIMOV Marsel 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 39% 5%
15 LIN Dashiell 100% 97% 81% 50% 18% 3%
16 JAIN Aditya 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 8%
17 JAYASEKARA Hiran H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 63%
18 SONG Aiden S. 100% 100% 98% 82% 41% 9% 1%
19 CHIN Julian S. 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 7% -
20 SUNG Chang-Han S. 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 15% 1%
21 FUKUDA Alessio R. 100% 99% 91% 63% 26% 4%
22 YU Anders 100% 100% 100% 94% 63%
23 JEON Caleb A. 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
24 WANG Andrew 100% 100% 97% 78% 39% 8% -
25 TSAY Jeremy M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 50%
26 MILLER Duncan R. 100% 84% 45% 14% 2% - -
27 WU Conrad J. 100% 83% 41% 10% 1% - -
28 FUKUDA Renzo K. 100% 91% 57% 19% 3% -
29 SONG Dylan S. 100% 99% 90% 66% 31% 7% -
30 BRISLAWN Reilly R. 100% 89% 57% 21% 4% -
31 OH Jonathan 100% 97% 73% 29% 2% -
32 SEAL Maximus R. 100% 94% 68% 32% 8% 1% -
33 PIESNER Joshua C. 100% 87% 48% 11% 1%
34 HOOSHI Jayden C. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 66% 18%
35 BANERJEE Anup 100% 100% 99% 90% 51% 9%
36 DANKAR Neel 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 15%
37 MURUHIN Yaroslav 100% 96% 74% 38% 11% 1%
38 JEAN Noe T. 100% 99% 87% 49% 13% 1%
39 GODZHIK Zachary 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 27% 5%
40 GOLDADE Luke A. 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
40 LUH Ethan K. 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 17% 1%
42 NG Eben S. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 31% 4%
43 KIM Jackson 100% 95% 72% 37% 11% 2% -
44 KIM Derek A. 100% 90% 44% 10% 1% - -
44 PAI Lakshan K. 100% 99% 90% 64% 31% 8% 1%
46 MU Jeffrey 100% 85% 42% 8% -
47 CHEN Bryce 100% 96% 69% 17% 1% -
48 COELHO Cristiano P. 100% 100% 100% 97% 74% 25%
49 BAEK David 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 13%
50 DIERKS Kian 100% 96% 76% 42% 14% 2%
51 CHIRASHNYA Adam 100% 99% 84% 42% 5% -
52 XIAO EDWARD 100% 91% 56% 16% 1% -
53 LAKE Wyatt J. 100% 98% 82% 43% 11% 1% -
54 WHITE Austin M. 100% 94% 68% 29% 7% 1% -
55 LIU Michael H. 100% 99% 94% 73% 36% 8% 1%
55 STRUGAR Marcus A. 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 4% -
57 SADOVSKY Leor B. 100% 94% 70% 35% 10% 1% -
58 CORTRIGHT Joshua C. 100% 100% 99% 90% 57% 19% 2%
59 KIM Andrew J. 100% 96% 78% 47% 18% 4% -
60 HOU Kenneth 100% 99% 83% 38% 5%
61 SIEGEL William P. 100% 81% 41% 12% 2% -
62 CHOU Jared T. 100% 96% 74% 35% 8% 1%
63 OH Joshua 100% 82% 28% 3% - -
64 LI Ryan Z. 100% 35% 4% - - - -
65 AIBEL Hudson J. 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 7%
66 ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) 100% 98% 83% 51% 18% 3% -
67 HE Bu Wei O. 100% 99% 86% 40% 8% 1% -
68 FINNEY Lorenz 100% 88% 55% 20% 4% - -
69 HOLDERNESS Landon 100% 42% 6% - - -
70 TAN Christien 100% 87% 46% 10% - -
71 MEJIA Matthew D. 100% 89% 53% 15% 1% - -
72 WOO Christian 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2% -
73 CHIN Ryan 100% 90% 57% 20% 3% - -
74 HOSKERI Anik S. 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
75 KIM Banseok 100% 88% 52% 17% 3% - -
76 LLIDO Soren 100% 96% 76% 39% 10% 1% -
77 LO Conrad 100% 99% 90% 59% 19% 3% -
78 KUO Evan 100% 88% 40% 6% -
79 WANG Ethan 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2%
80 NAM Michael 100% 85% 47% 14% 2% - -
81 BAO Aaron 100% 89% 57% 23% 5% 1% -
82 ZHENG zhe 100% 82% 41% 10% 1% -
83 KIM Ryan Y. 100% 49% 9% - - -
84 ZUO Ethan 100% 71% 28% 6% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.