King of Prussia, PA - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | V V D V V | V V V V V V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 2 | PRILUTSKY David B. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 7 | HO Ryan J. | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 10 | ZHANG Henry C. | V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 11 | SCHENCK Koen M. | D V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 12 | WU Alexander | V V D D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 13 | OURSLER Jack | V D V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 14 | BAE Kevin | V D D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 15 | GAO William | V D D V D | V V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 16 | HERGERT Benito | D V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | GOOR Julian | V D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 18 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | DAI Jonathan T. | D D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 21 | PYO Michael M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 22 | TIAN Aaron C. | D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 23 | UM Ethan A. | V V D V D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | LI Richard | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 25 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 26 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 27 | KWON Ethan | V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | PELOSKY Zack B. | V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 29 | DESOLA Aidan J. | V V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 30 | KEE Andrew L. | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | BALL James T. | D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 32 | ANTON Nathaniel | D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 33 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V V V D V | D | 1.2 | 4 | +2.8 |
| 34 | WANG Gerald Y. | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 35 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 36 | GRAHAM Roy J. | V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 37 | AHN Jun | D D V V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 38 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | V D D V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 39 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 40 | LEE Jacob J | V D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 41 | BOBROW Logan | V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 42 | GATZA Logan | V D V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 43 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | D V D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 44 | BROWN Alexander R. | D D V V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 45 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 46 | BING Charles | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 47 | JIANG Owen | D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 47 | STRAYER Andrew | D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 49 | WHITEHEAD Amir | D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 50 | MILLER Aidan A. | V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 51 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 52 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 52 | LE Vyn A. | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 54 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 55 | CAI Oliver K. | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 56 | LI Eric | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 57 | WALTER Evran M. | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 58 | BELLUOMO David C. | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 59 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 60 | MAGIDSON Josh | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 61 | BAUMANN Gunnar | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 61 | SZE Timothy | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 63 | TORRES Treston | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 63 | REZA Farazi | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.