Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Nicholas Z. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 46% | 43% |
2 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
3 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 5% | 24% | 47% | 23% | |
3 | GODZHIK Zachary | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
5 | COELHO Cristiano P. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
6 | WONG Adrian | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
7 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
8 | BANERJEE Anup | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
9 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 50% | 30% |
10 | YU Anders | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
10 | CHOU Jared T. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - |
12 | XU Jia Bao | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 47% |
13 | JEON Caleb A. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | |
14 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
15 | NG Eben S. | - | - | - | 5% | 37% | 48% | 9% |
16 | AIBEL Hudson J. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
17 | LO Conrad | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
18 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
19 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
20 | MEJIA Matthew D. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
21 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
22 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 45% | |
23 | BAEK David | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
24 | PAI Lakshan K. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
25 | CHEN Charlie Tian-You | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
26 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | |
27 | WOO Christian | 11% | 40% | 38% | 11% | - | - | |
28 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
29 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
31 | KIM Andrew J. | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
32 | KIM Jackson | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
33 | BAO Aaron | 5% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 3% | - | |
34 | TAN Christien | 10% | 38% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
35 | FINNEY Lorenz | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
36 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
37 | MIN Eric | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
38 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | KRYLTSOV Michael | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
40 | KIM Ryan Y. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
41 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | |
42 | LIU Michael H. | 4% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - | |
43 | BAE Henry J. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
44 | OH Joshua | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
45 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
46 | LLIDO Soren | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | - | - |
46 | WANG Ethan | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
48 | CHIN Ryan | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
48 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
50 | KIM Harrison | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
51 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 11% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
52 | WU Lucas | - | < 1% | 1% | 16% | 65% | 17% | |
53 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
54 | LI Patrick | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | RANJITH Yash M. | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | ZHENG zhe | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
58 | YOUNG Owen | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
59 | FUKUDA Diego | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
60 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
61 | CHENG Jonathan | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
62 | ZUO Ethan | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
63 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 16% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
64 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | LIU Aaron | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | BECKER Julian | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
67 | BHARADWAJ Venkatesh | 14% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.