Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SIU Aiden | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 2 | MIN Eric | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 3 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 3 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
| 5 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 33% |
| 6 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 7 | HUANG Eythan | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 8 | TANG August L. | - | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 10 | PARK Sangmin | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 11 | CHOI Ethan | - | 4% | 25% | 48% | 23% | |
| 12 | LIU Ethan | 2% | 18% | 40% | 33% | 7% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Aaron | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 14 | YAO Bradley | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 28% | |
| 15 | HAN Derek | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 16 | WU Lucas | 1% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | DINSAY Kristjan | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 12% | |
| 18 | FINDLAY Zachary | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | LING Eddie | 1% | 11% | 38% | 40% | 11% | |
| 20 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 21 | TANG Albert | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 22 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 23 | SISINNI Riccardo | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | NGUYEN martin | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | XU Andy P. | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 26 | TANG Alexander L. | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 7% | |
| 27 | EDWARDS Maxon | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 28 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 29 | CHOI Benjamin | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 30 | NICOLETTI Luca | 10% | 42% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 4% | 29% | 44% | 20% | 3% | |
| 32 | RUSSELL Paul | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | ALLEN Henry G. | 2% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 5% | |
| 34 | YUE Jackson | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | CHUANG Oscar | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | SLUSHER Gideon | 6% | 36% | 42% | 15% | 1% | |
| 37 | PARK Rion | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 38 | MANDZY Theodor | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | TSAY Jordan R. | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | GUTH Joseph | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 42 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | LE Jacob | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 45 | CAI Ron | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | CHINTE Oliver | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | CHEN David | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.