Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
| 2 | MIN Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 3 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 3 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | |
| 5 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 6 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 7 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | |
| 8 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 10 | PARK Sangmin | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 11 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 23% | |
| 12 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 7% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
| 14 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 15 | HAN Derek | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 16 | WU Lucas | 100% | 99% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 12% | |
| 18 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | LING Eddie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 11% | |
| 20 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 21 | TANG Albert | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 22 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 23 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
| 26 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | |
| 27 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 28 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 15% |
| 29 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 5% | |
| 30 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 90% | 48% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 96% | 67% | 22% | 3% | |
| 32 | RUSSELL Paul | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 33% | 5% | |
| 34 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | SLUSHER Gideon | 100% | 94% | 58% | 17% | 1% | |
| 37 | PARK Rion | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 38 | MANDZY Theodor | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 39 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 40 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 41 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 42 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | LE Jacob | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 45 | CAI Ron | 100% | 75% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | CHINTE Oliver | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | CHEN David | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.