Grand Rapids, MI - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 84% | |
| 2 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 43% | |
| 3 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 3 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 5 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 6 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 8% |
| 7 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 30% | |
| 8 | DORE Davis | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 9 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 10 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% | |
| 11 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | - | |
| 12 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | |
| 13 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
| 15 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 16 | HAN Derek | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 17 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | KELLY Tommy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 18% | 2% | |
| 19 | FINDLAY Zachary | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 15% | - | |
| 20 | LAI Twayne | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | IRVINE Brody | 100% | 77% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 98% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | NYKAMP Caleb | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 27 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | |
| 29 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 30 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | MARK IAN | 100% | 98% | 70% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MANGIONE Alexander | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BAYLDON william | 100% | 90% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | VANDER VELDE Roman | 100% | 97% | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | DEVRIES William | 100% | 89% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 97% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 89% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.