Grand Rapids, MI - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
| 2 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 3 | YANG Luao | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
| 5 | YI Stephen K. | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% | |
| 6 | TAN Christien | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 35% | 4% | |
| 7 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 43% | 3% |
| 8 | LOVIN Vlad | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 10% | - |
| 9 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 10 | VAN BUREN Brett J. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
| 11 | WONG Antonio | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
| 13 | CHENG Nathan | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 2% | |
| 14 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | - | |
| 15 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | |
| 16 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 1% | 7% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 1% | |
| 17 | JI Aidan Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | REEVES Liam | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 4% | |
| 19 | ZHENG zhe | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 20 | PRASANNA Advaith | - | 4% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
| 21 | EUH Jason | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | LAI Twayne | 5% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 23 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 40% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 23 | KHAN Adnan | 1% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | AMES Tucker | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | FLORES Justin | 31% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 28 | PALWAI Suhas | 4% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | GOHSMAN Maxwell | 12% | 45% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | FECHTMEYER Theodore | 21% | 55% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | IRVINE Brody | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | REAUME Nate | 27% | 50% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.