Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
2 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
3 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% | |
3 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
5 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
6 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
7 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% |
8 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | |
9 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
10 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% |
11 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
12 | PARK Sangmin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
13 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% |
14 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
15 | LE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
16 | UPENDER West | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
17 | KAWADA Sebastien | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 5% |
18 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
19 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
20 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
21 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
22 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
23 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 98% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
24 | YI William | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
25 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
26 | HIRAMOTO Satoshi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
27 | DENG David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
28 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
29 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
30 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% | |
31 | TAN Pyron | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
32 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 4% | |
33 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
34 | BURRES kenneth | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
35 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
36 | MORROW Sean | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 12% | |
37 | PARK Rion | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
38 | HE Bourne | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
39 | ZHANG Graham | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
40 | KAUSHISH Rayirth | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | SHEN Oliver | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | |
42 | HOM Logan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
43 | PARK David | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
44 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
45 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
46 | PARK Roy | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
47 | PARK William | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
48 | JEONG Taewoo | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
49 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
50 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
51 | FOY Grant | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
52 | YU ShiLin H. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
53 | YU ShiYu H. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
54 | WU Thomas | 100% | 94% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
55 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
56 | KARPMAN Benny | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
57 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - | |
58 | HE Ian | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
58 | LIM Zachary | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
60 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
61 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
62 | ZHANG Max | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
63 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | |
64 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
65 | METIN Atlas | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.