Round Rock, TX - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 51% | 37% |
| 2 | GORBACHEV Alexander | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 3 | DAI Jonathan T. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | LI Richard | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 5 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 6 | ZHOU Oscar J. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 30% | |
| 7 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
| 8 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | REYES Omar | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 38% |
| 10 | WEEKS Richard P. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 11 | AIBEL Hudson J. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | DORAN Wesley C. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | LUH Ethan K. | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | REEVES Liam | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | YANG Luao | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 16 | MENG Zhaoyi | 1% | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | FINNEY Lorenz | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 19 | LIU Michael H. | - | 1% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | |
| 20 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 21 | STEVENS Paul S. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 4% |
| 22 | PIERCE Cody | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 23 | JIANG Owen | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 24 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 25 | GODZHIK Zachary | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 26 | WONG Garrick G. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 27 | TANG August L. | - | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 28 | LI Peihong | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | - |
| 29 | KIM Ryan Y. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | BAO Aaron | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
| 31 | GAO Ryan | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 32 | WYMAN Julian | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WU Lucas | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
| 34 | AHMED Yousef | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 1% |
| 35 | LIU Zixian | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 36 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | IVES William R. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 38 | XIANG Derrick | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | JIANG Raymond | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | HEARN Christen J. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 41 | CAPRA Ethan | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 19% | 46% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | MCNELIS Andy S. | 1% | 16% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | XIE Brandon | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 45 | ZHOU Joseph H. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 48 | MEMON Saqib | 48% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | OH Joshua | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CHIN Ryan | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 3% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | HESSE Hans | 3% | 22% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 53 | CHENG Marcus | 8% | 38% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | RANJITH Yash M. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | FUKUDA Diego | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 56 | XU Ethan | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | HEARN Asher L. | 30% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHENG zhe | 67% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | STERNBERG Ira M. | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | SHAH Shrey | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | STERNBERG Moses A. | 20% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.