Round Rock, TX - Round Rock, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 37% |
2 | GORBACHEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
3 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
3 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
5 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
6 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
7 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% |
8 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
9 | REYES Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 38% |
10 | WEEKS Richard P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
11 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
12 | DORAN Wesley C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
13 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
14 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
15 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
16 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
17 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
18 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
19 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 9% | |
20 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 25% |
21 | STEVENS Paul S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% |
22 | PIERCE Cody | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
23 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 5% | - |
24 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
25 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
26 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
27 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - |
28 | LI Peihong | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | - |
29 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
30 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 13% | |
31 | GAO Ryan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
32 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 3% | - |
33 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
34 | AHMED Yousef | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
35 | LIU Zixian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
36 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
37 | IVES William R. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
38 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - |
39 | JIANG Raymond | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
40 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
41 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
42 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 81% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
43 | MCNELIS Andy S. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
45 | ZHOU Joseph H. | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
46 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
47 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
48 | MEMON Saqib | 100% | 52% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
49 | OH Joshua | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
51 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
52 | HESSE Hans | 100% | 97% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
53 | CHENG Marcus | 100% | 92% | 53% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
54 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
56 | XU Ethan | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
57 | HEARN Asher L. | 100% | 70% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
58 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
59 | STERNBERG Ira M. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
60 | SHAH Shrey | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
60 | STERNBERG Moses A. | 100% | 80% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.